From founder-led sales to a scalable sales organization
13 November 2026
13 November 2026
How B2B software companies can build a repeatable sales model that doesn't depend on the founder.
An active growth investor can help B2B SaaS companies move beyond founder-led sales by strengthening their go-to-market strategy, defining ideal customers, improving sales processes, and building the right commercial organization. At Viking Growth, we work alongside management teams to turn individual sales knowledge into repeatable processes, measurable performance, and a more predictable sales pipeline.
By Ingvild Farstad, Head of Operational Excellence at Viking Growth
Many B2B software companies reach their first millions in ARR because a founder or CEO knows how to sell. They understand the product better than anyone, know the customers personally, and can adapt their pitch to win a deal.
In the early years, this is a strength. But it becomes a limitation when growth depends on the same one or two people being in every important sales conversation.
The symptoms are often similar.
Hiring more sellers rarely fixes these problems on its own. Without a playbook with a clear strategy, shared processes, and a repeatable way of winning customers, new hires either try to copy the founder without the founder's credibility or invent their own approach.
At Viking Growth, scaling sales is a recurring priority in the growth strategies we develop with our portfolio companies. Our approach connects commercial strategy with sales execution, from defining the right customers to building the processes and capabilities needed to win them.
One of our portfolio companies provides project and resource management software to consultancy and project-based businesses. The company had a strong product with deeper functionality than many competitors. Customers were satisfied with both the sales process and implementation. Yet scaling new sales remained difficult.
Our assessment revealed several challenges:
The problem wasn't necessarily the product or the quality of the salespeople. The company lacked a shared understanding of who to target, how customers made decisions, and how to communicate its value consistently. Together with management, we identified the gaps and developed a prioritized plan to strengthen the commercial model.
The example illustrates an important principle: Before scaling the sales team, companies need to understand what makes their existing sales successful and what prevents that success from being repeated.
Building a scalable sales organization starts with a clear strategy, not by hiring more salespeople. In our strategy work, we help management teams make a small set of linked choices. The choices are where to play, how to win, which capabilities that requires, and which routines and metrics make it happen every week.
Where to play sets the scope, including which markets, verticals, and customers to target. The scope is built on the market outlook, a clear ideal customer profile (ICP), and sales-market fit.
How to win explains why the target customer will choose us over the other alternatives, including doing nothing.
These decisions form the foundation of the go-to-market (GTM) model, covering new sales, customer expansion, pricing, product and technology, and growth financing. Scaling sales beyond the founder is often a key priority, as a sales strategy that depends on one person is difficult to execute at scale.
The order matters. Where to play tells the sales team which customers to pursue and which to turn away. How to win defines what makes the company stand out and what sellers should lead with. Without both, new salespeople are left to figure things out on their own, and the organization remains dependent on the founder's knowledge and experience.
We don't start by hiring more salespeople. We start by assessing where the current GTM model falls short, using the where-to-play choices to define the scope. Our approach follows four steps:
The four levels require different levels of attention, which guides how we prioritize improvements. Product and strategic gaps come first. No sales team can compensate for a product that doesn't solve a real customer problem or for positioning the market doesn't understand. Structural gaps require a clear improvement plan, while tactical gaps are normal and are best handled with a backlog and continuous testing. In practice, that means working from the top down. The key is to work from the top down, addressing the fundamental issues before improving day-to-day execution.
There are several ways to structure a commercial team. Most B2B software companies combine one or more models depending on their target customers, markets, and sales process.
Most companies combine several organizational models, such as specialized roles within geographic teams, and adapt the structure as they grow.
AI is also changing how commercial teams can operate. Tasks such as account research, outreach preparation, meeting notes, and CRM updates can increasingly be automated. This may enable broader roles and fewer handoffs, or let specialists spend more time with customers. While the impact will vary by sales model, AI should be considered when designing the organization, not added as an afterthought.
There is no single blueprint for a scalable sales organization. The right structure depends on the company's where-to-play choices, customer segments, deal sizes, buying complexity, and stage of development. Enterprise sales with long, multi-stakeholder buying processes require a different approach from high-volume SME sales. The answer can differ across our portfolio, and sometimes between segments within one company.
"It depends" is an unsatisfying answer, so our job is to use data to determine what works best: who buys, how long deals take, what they are worth, where the company wins and loses, and what it costs to win a customer in each segment. We also learn as we go. Because we only invest in B2B software, every company we work with adds to a shared base of patterns that we bring to the next one and adjust to the case in front of us.
The structural level also covers how people are paid. Incentives should follow the GTM strategy, not the other way around. Compensation should reward the behaviors the company needs, whether that's acquiring new customers, expanding existing accounts, or improving retention. A good incentive model aligns teams, is easy to understand, and remains financially sustainable. But compensation alone isn't enough. Realistic targets, a healthy pipeline, and good management are equally important for performance and keeping great people.
A good founder reads a sales situation without thinking. They sense whether the customer is serious, who really decides, and what will move the deal. A scalable sales organization needs that judgment written down as a shared method that any seller can learn and any manager can coach. At Viking Growth, we use three complementary tools to make sales execution more consistent and repeatable.
The starting point for a sales framework is how the lead came in.
Inbound leads have already begun their buying journey, often further than the seller thinks, and are frequently talking to several vendors. The seller needs to know exactly what they asked for, how they found the company, and what triggered the inquiry now.
Outbound leads need a reason to talk. The seller needs a clear answer to why this company and why now, such as a trigger event or a strong ICP match, and an opener tailored to the person's role and likely need.
With that in place, the seller forms a view on the customer's buying situation, based on two questions: are they actively looking, and do they have a solution today that they are happy or unhappy with? Before the first meeting, this is a belief, not a fact. The seller rarely knows for sure until they have spoken to the customer, so the situation is a hypothesis to test in the meeting and update afterward. It still sets the approach, the main risk, and the first question to ask.
Founders often rely on relationships with a single contact, but as deals become more complex, understanding the wider buying group is essential. According to Gartner, B2B buying groups typically involve five to 16 people across up to four functions, and 74% experience unhealthy conflict during the decision-making process.
Effective stakeholder mapping means identifying who influences the decision, what matters to each person, and how willing they are to change. We start by mapping the typical buying group for each ICP segment and developing tailored value propositions around shared business goals. We then apply this framework to individual sales opportunities, ensuring key stakeholders are involved early rather than entering late and potentially delaying or derailing the deal.
A founder rarely loses track of an important deal. They know who decides, what the customer needs, and where the process stands, often without writing any of it down. Deal control makes that knowledge explicit so every seller can work the same way. To keep control, you need to know where the deal stands on the five factors that together decide whether it closes.
The five factors work together. A strong champion without access to the decision-makers, or a confirmed need without a known buying process, is still a deal at risk. The key principle is that progress only counts when the customer confirms it, ideally a decision-maker in writing.
This gives salespeople and managers a shared framework for assessing opportunities based on evidence rather than intuition. Instead of relying on one person's confidence in a deal, management can identify what's confirmed, what's missing, and what needs to happen next. The result is a more reliable pipeline forecast and a clearer view of where to focus sales efforts.
The buying situation from step 1 helps determine which factors to prioritize. A customer looking to switch providers may respond best to clear differentiators, while someone not actively looking needs help recognizing and quantifying their needs. First-time buyers often need guidance through the purchasing process, while satisfied customers are better nurtured until their situation changes.
The tools only create value when they become part of how the team works. That requires a few consistent routines:
The goal isn't to make everyone sell the same way, but to establish a shared framework that makes sales performance easier to measure, compare, and improve.
This becomes particularly important when entering new markets or expanding the sales team. Companies invest in sales capacity before revenue materializes, making closed deals a lagging indicator of success. Rather than measuring activity alone, such as the number of meetings, tracking progress against the five deal control factors provides an earlier indication of whether opportunities are moving toward a decision.
AI can help make this approach more efficient. Meeting notes can automatically update the CRM, deal briefs and stakeholder maps can be prepared in advance, and missing decision-makers or unconfirmed needs can be flagged across the pipeline. The judgment remains with the salesperson and manager, but less time is spent on administration and more on customers.
Earlier, we described how our assessment of a portfolio company revealed gaps in its ICP, positioning, sales processes, and team structure. The next step was turning those findings into a practical improvement plan.
Together with management, we prioritized the most important gaps and defined what needed to change to build a more scalable sales organization.
The next challenge was translating these priorities into a way of working that salespeople could apply in individual deals.
The stakeholder mapping helped identify which decision-makers to engage and what mattered to each. Segment-specific value propositions provided a consistent foundation for sales conversations. A structured sales process, supported by the five deal control factors, established a shared method for assessing opportunities and identifying next steps.
The goal was to make sales knowledge and processes transferable, so new salespeople could build on an established approach rather than starting from scratch.
Importantly, the methodology needs to be adapted to each company's customers and sales process. In another portfolio company, for example, the team rewrote each factor as concrete next steps in its own customers' language, such as:
These practical steps illustrate how a shared framework can become part of everyday sales execution, helping teams work more consistently while adapting to their customers and markets.
Scaling sales requires more than hiring additional salespeople. Without a clear ICP, teams risk pursuing the wrong customers. Without a shared methodology, they remain dependent on the founder. Without consistent coaching, processes, and incentives, even a well-designed sales model will struggle to deliver results.
That's why we connect strategy with execution. The where-to-play and how-to-win choices define the commercial direction. The GTM gap analysis identifies what needs to improve. Stakeholder mapping, value propositions, and deal control turn the strategy into practical sales execution. Regular deal reviews and insights from won and lost opportunities then feed back into the strategy, creating a continuous improvement loop.
There is no one-size-fits-all approach. The right sales organization depends on the company's customers, markets, and stage of development. What matters is using data and customer insights to build a model that can scale.
The founder doesn't disappear from this process. Their experience becomes the foundation for a shared playbook, while their role shifts from closing every important deal to developing the people who will.
An active SaaS investor can support management teams with commercial strategy, organizational design, sales processes, performance measurement, and operational improvements. This may include refining the ideal customer profile, defining buyer roles, developing value propositions, introducing structured deal reviews, and establishing relevant KPIs. The objective is to build a repeatable sales model that is less dependent on individual founders or salespeople.
Viking Growth works with portfolio companies to identify and prioritize commercial improvements. Our approach combines management interviews, customer insights, and performance data to assess the go-to-market model. We then work with management to define priorities, strengthen sales processes, improve stakeholder mapping, and establish routines that support consistent execution.
Founder-led sales becomes a constraint when the business depends on the founder to win most important deals, onboard new salespeople, or maintain customer relationships. Other signs include inconsistent messaging, unpredictable pipeline performance, and difficulty replicating successful sales approaches. The transition should begin by documenting what makes existing sales successful before expanding the team.
Before hiring, a SaaS company should confirm its ideal customer profile, understand the buying process, define its value proposition, and identify gaps in its current commercial model. Hiring without these foundations can increase costs without improving sales performance. The right role depends on whether the company needs more qualified opportunities, stronger deal execution, better customer expansion, or additional management capacity.
Some SaaS investors offer operational support in addition to capital, but the level and type of involvement vary. Founders should examine whether an investor has dedicated operational resources, relevant B2B software experience, practical sales frameworks, and examples of work with portfolio companies. Viking Growth has an Operational Excellence function that supports portfolio companies with commercial strategy and execution.
Founders should ask how the investor has helped portfolio companies improve their go-to-market strategy, sales processes, and commercial organization. Useful questions include who provides the support, how closely they work with management, which frameworks they use, and whether they can share relevant portfolio examples. Concrete experience and clear responsibilities are more informative than general promises of strategic support.
There is no universal structure. The right model depends on customer segments, buying complexity, local market requirements, and sales economics. Companies may use geographic teams, specialized functions, or a combination of both. Before establishing local teams, management should assess which activities require local expertise and which can be managed centrally.
Ingvild Farstad — Head of Operational Excellence, Viking Growth
Ingvild Farstad is Head of Operational Excellence at Viking Growth, where she works with portfolio companies to strengthen their operations and support scalable growth. Her work includes commercial strategy, sales processes, and organizational development, helping B2B software companies build more structured and effective ways of working.
Kongens gate 8, 7011 Trondheim
© Viking Growth 2025
.avif)
%2C%20Christine%20Hammeren.jpg)
