Financing the growth of your B2B software company

Anders Løe
Head of Investor Relations

SaaS companies can scale organically or inorganically, through product- or sales-led growth, mergers, or acquisitions. Deciding how to fund that growth is a strategic choice that can define your company’s long-term trajectory. Whether you rely on cash flow, raise equity, or take on debt, each path comes with its own trade-offs. The right financing approach depends on your company’s stage, size, profitability profile, and growth ambitions.

This article breaks down the core financing options available to SaaS companies, how to balance them effectively, and align your financing strategy with long-term goals. We also highlight the pros and cons of each approach, supported by real-world examples from our portfolio.

Anders Løe, Head of Investor Relations at Viking Growth

Different Financing Options

There is no one-size-fits-all solution to funding SaaS growth. The optimal financing strategy depends on your company’s maturity, capital requirements, risk tolerance, and strategic vision.

Broadly, SaaS companies rely on three primary sources of funding, often in combination, Internal cash flow, Equity financing and Debt financing

Each option carries distinct implications for ownership, control, dilution, and financial flexibility. Below, we outline the key characteristics, advantages, and considerations of each approach.

1. Company Cash Flow

  • Refers to funding growth through profits generated by the business.
  • Operating cash flow reflects the net cash generated from core business activities.
  • Offers control and sustainability without external influence.
  • Works best for companies with positive operating margins and modest capital needs.

2. Equity Financing

  • Involves raising capital by issuing shares to existing shareholders or new investors.
  • Commonly used to fund growth initiatives or cover cash gaps.
  • Can occur through private placements, strategic investors, or an eventual IPO.
  • Enables access to larger capital pools, often with strategic support.

3. Debt Financing

  • Involves borrowing capital that must be repaid over time, typically with interest.
  • Often used for larger investments, such as acquisitions or infrastructure expansion.
  • Provides funding without dilution but requires careful management of terms and covenants.
  • Can be more cost-effective than equity in the long run if managed well.

What Needs to Be in Place to Get Funding?

Once you’ve evaluated the different options, the next step is understanding what’s required to secure each type of financing.

Bringing in Equity

In the early growth stages, typically before reaching €10M in annual recurring revenue (ARR), companies most often raise equity through minority or majority primary investments, as well as employee share schemes. At this point, profitability or a defined M&A strategy is usually not a requirement for raising capital.

As the company scales, additional equity can be raised by:

  • Bringing in a co-investor
  • Initiating a recapitalization (recap)
  • Preparing for an IPO

Both recaps and IPOs come with higher expectations around profitability, scale, and deal size:

  • A recap is generally attractive at over €20M in ARR.
  • A successful IPO typically requires even greater scale to generate investor interest and drive meaningful liquidity on the exchange.

Debt Possibilities at Different Stages

As SaaS companies mature, debt can become an attractive complement or alternative to equity. The type of debt available depends on size, revenue predictability, and operating maturity.

Here are the most common debt instruments and when they tend to be used:

Traditional Bank Loans

Secured loans with fixed repayment terms is best suited for companies with strong financials and predictable cash flow. Typically used for working capital or equipment financing.

Credit Facilities

Flexible lines of credit that can be drawn as needed, which is useful for short-term liquidity needs, especially for companies with recurring revenue and solid ARR visibility.

Debt Funds

Non-bank lenders offering tailored financing solutions, including venture debt is ideal for growth-stage companies that may not yet qualify for traditional bank lending, but have strong forward-looking metrics.

Bonds

Primarily relevant for later-stage or pre-IPO companies with substantial capital needs. Bonds provide access to capital markets but require robust financial transparency, compliance, and scale.

Comparison between Cash Flow, equity and Debt

Company Cash flow

Pros:

• No dilution
• Retains full control
• Sustainable path

Cons:

• Limits speed of growth
• Slower scaling capacity
• Vulnerable to market fluctuations

Equity Financing

Pros:

• Access to larger capital pools
• No repayment obligation
• Brings strategic partners onboard

Cons:

• Dilution of ownership
• Higher pressure for growth and returns
• Time-consuming fundraising cycles

Debt Financing

Pros:

• No dilution
• Maintains ownership and control
• Often cheaper than equity long term

Cons:

• Requires repayment with interest
• Covenants may restrict flexibility
• Harder to obtain at early stages

Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Financing Path

To choose the right financing mix, founders should consider these key questions:

  • What is your current cash runway?
  • How predictable is your ARR?
  • Are you prioritizing speed, control, or strategic input?
  • What level of dilution are you willing to accept?
  • Do you meet the requirements for debt or equity at this stage?

These questions help align your capital strategy with your company’s operating realities and growth ambitions.

In today’s environment, capital efficiency is more important than ever. Founders should consider how each financing option affects their burn rate and overall financial resilience. For a deeper dive into how investors evaluate burn multiple — and how to improve it — see our article on Burn Rate in SaaS: How to Calculate It and Why Investors Care.

Real-World Examples

As investors, we have supported our portfolio companies with a range of financing solutions tailored to specific objectives. These include funding acquisitions and expansions through bonds with Pareto, ABG Sundal Collier and Nordea, debt funds with Ture Invest and AshGrove Capital, and bank loans with Danske Bank and Nordea. Since 2020, we have raised over NOK 8 billion to help drive growth, support strategic initiatives, and create long-term value.

Conclusion

Choosing how to finance a B2B SaaS company is one of the most strategic decisions a founder will make. Reinvesting revenue offers control and sustainability; equity brings capital and strategic partners; and debt accelerates growth without dilution. The most effective approach is rarely a single path, most successful SaaS companies use a mix over time.

By understanding the requirements, trade-offs, and optimal timing for each type of financing, founders can build a capital strategy that fuels short-term momentum and supports value creation.